Daredevil on Netflix

daredevil-red-costume-lo-resOn April 10th, Daredevil premiered on Netflix. And no, I’m not talking about the 2003 film directed by Mark Steven Johnson. This is a thirteen-episode Netflix original series.

All of the live-action properties produced by Marvel Studios take place within a shared universe and Daredevil is no exception. As with all Netflix original shows, all thirteen episodes were released at once. So when I got home from work Friday afternoon, I immediately began binge-watching, and I watched the final episode on Saturday.

This show is really freaking excellent. It’s much darker than the Marvel stuff we’ve seen up to now, due to the freedom offered by Netflix. And it’s something that really suits the character of Daredevil, who came to prominence during Frank Miller’s seminal run on the title that injected a heavy dose of crime noir into the character.

Charlie Cox is wonderful as Matt Murdock and there’s really no one better to play this part. Vincent D’Onofrio’s Kingpin may not have the physical presence that Michael Clarke Duncan had in the Daredevil film, but he more than makes up for that with a spectacular performance that brings a lot of nuance to the character of Wilson Fisk. There’s great work from the cast on pretty much every front, but I have to give a special shout-out to Scott Glenn’s portrayal of Matt’s blind mentor, Stick. The episode when he appears is one of my favorites, not only because of Glenn’s excellent performance, but also because it introduces the Hand.

As I mentioned before, Daredevil is the darkest thing Marvel Studios has done so far. But Marvel is doing something smart because they aren’t taking a one-tone-fits-all approach with their properties (as opposed to the approach adopted by a certain Distinguished Competition with their films). Just like the comics, these movies and shows are adopting an appropriate tone for each character. With Captain America, they give us political intrigue. Iron Man is techno-thriller, Thor is more fantasy, Guardians of the Galaxy is fun space opera, and Daredevil is a gritty crime drama. Marvel could have easily said, “well quippy, upbeat heroes are what have worked for us, so we’re going to do the same thing to Daredevil.” But they didn’t. Instead, they said, “we’re doing Frank Miller’s Daredevil and we’re going to remain true to that.”

And it’s wonderful. It also illustrates something that my good buddy Derrick Ferguson has said many times—not every superhero needs a summer blockbuster movie. And he’s absolutely right. Characters like Daredevil work so much better in a serialized format, because it gives more time for long-running stories and plotlines to play out. That was one of the biggest problems with the Daredevil film—it basically tried to cram a television season’s worth of storytelling into two hours (or an hour and a half if you’ve only seen the vastly inferior theatrical cut). Now, if the Daredevil series does the classic Elektra/Bullseye story (which, come on, of course they’ll do it), they can have it play out over the course of an entire season and give it the room it needs to properly breathe.

I’ve been looking forward to these Marvel/Netflix shows ever since they were first announced. But now after I’ve seen Daredevil, I’m even more excited for the remaining three—AKA Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, and Iron Fist. And then they’ll all come together in The Defenders.

But even more exciting than that is another season of Daredevil. Let’s hope it comes sooner rather than later.

If you like superheroes, you might also consider giving my prose superhero serial, Vanguard, a try. Check out the first episode and see if it’s your thing.

[mybooktable book=”vanguard-1-come-the-exemplar” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”true”]

The POWER/RANGERS Debacle

PowerRangersfanfilm_article_story_largeSo there’s this new fan film out now called Power/Rangers. It’s around fifteen minutes long and features a grim and gritty reimagining of Saban’s Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers and stars Katee Sackhoff as Kimberly and James Van Der Beek as Rocky. SCG Power Rangers LLC, the company that owns the rights to the property, demanded it be taken down.

 

Adi Shankar, who created the short, isn’t backing down. In a response, he wrote: “I consider this an outright infringement on freedom of expression and individualism. … Films like my Power/Rangers ‘Bootleg’ are vital expressions of creativity in our troubled world. If we suppress this creativity and become passive participants in the consumption of the culture we live in, we implicitly allow a dangerous precedent to be set for the future of the internet.”

 

Some of the Internet chatter around this has thrown accusations at Haim Saban that his reaction to Power/Rangers is nothing more than jealousy that he can’t make something as good as this, or that he’s envious of all the attention it’s getting. To which I respond with three simple words: It. Doesn’t. Matter.

 

Saban and Power Rangers LLC own the rights to these characters. These are their toys. And if they don’t want anyone else to play with them without their express permission, then guess what? That’s their right! People have claimed that Saban is “whining” about this, but I say that Shankar is the real whiner here. He’s coming out and saying that he should have the right to use characters he doesn’t own in any way he sees fit, and if the copyright holders tell him to stop, then that’s stifling creative freedom. What about the freedom to control the properties you own? Why is that freedom not important to Shankar?

 

I’ve written fanfic, so I get Shankar’s desire to create something with characters he has a passion for. But every time you commission an unauthorized work featuring characters you do not own—regardless of whether or not it’s for profit—you run the risk of pissing off the people who own those properties. And if they tell you, “we don’t like what you’re doing with our characters, take it down,” then you have an obligation to respect their rights.

 

Growing up watching the Power Rangers doesn’t grant you ownership over them that supersedes the rights of the people who actually own the intellectual property. And no, just because you’re not making money off it doesn’t give you the right to do whatever you want.

 

But beyond that, there’s a larger question of appropriateness. Power Rangers is a show for children. And it’s still around today. Imagine you’re a parent and your kid is a fan of Power Rangers. He goes online and Googles Power Rangers and this video pops up. You walk in on him and see him watching a video where the Black Ranger is in bed with topless women (depending on which version you saw), where comic relief characters Bulk and Skull are portrayed as meth addicts, and where people are being murdered in bloody, gratuitous ways. How would you react? My guess is you’d be pretty pissed. I know I would be if I found out my young nephew stumbled upon this.

 

In the past, when kids would grow into adults, they would leave behind those books, movies, and TV shows that no longer appealed to them as adults. You don’t see anyone who grew up with Hanna-Barbara cartoons demanding that the cast of Scooby Doo be updated to portray Scooby and Shaggy as heroin addicts, Fred snapping the necks of their antagonists, or topless scenes of Velma and Daphne.

 

This demand a lot of modern-day fandom has for properties they enjoyed as kids to be updated as grim, gritty and violent is something I just do not understand. And hey, I love grim and gritty, I love violent movies and shows. My favorite directors include Quentin Tarantino and Takashi Miike and I think Breaking Bad is one of the greatest TV shows ever created.

 

But those things were created for adults and were meant to be enjoyed by adults. Power Rangers was created for kids. It’s bright, it’s colorful, it’s campy. It doesn’t need to be turned into nightmare fuel.

 

If Shankar wanted to create his own violent property that draws influences from Power Rangers, I’d have no problem with that. Because that’s his own original property and influences come from anywhere and everywhere. When Guillermo Del Toro wanted to do something that was inspired by Godzilla or Voltron, he didn’t just make a movie with those characters—he drew influences from those things to come up with Pacific Rim. But to just outright steal a kids’ property and twist it into something completely unrecognizable isn’t only a slap in the face to the rights of the owners of Power Rangers, it’s just flat-out crass.

 

If you enjoyed Power Rangers as a kid and now find it cheesy or campy or uninteresting, then guess what? That property is no longer for you. Leave Power Rangers for the next generation of kids and move on to find something that appeals to your adult sensibilities. There’s certainly plenty of adult-oriented sci-fi material out there to choose from. But don’t demand that Power Rangers grows up with you—that’s just selfish.

In Defense of Remakes

l_141320_0407362_7abfc2e6Recently, I began watching the reboot of Battlestar Galactica. I had watched a few episodes several years ago, but didn’t quite get into it. Now I’ve tried it again and have gotten sucked in. I’ve been watching a few episodes every day and now I’m in the middle of the fourth and final season.

 

And as I watch this show, I can’t help but think about some other properties that have been in the news lately. There are two remakes/reboots in the works that involve properties very close to my heart, and which have drawn a lot of negative reactions from fans.

 

The first is Ghostbusters and the second is The Crow. Ghostbusters is one of the first movies I remember watching. Ghostbusters II was actually the first movie I remember seeing in the movie theater. Paul Feig is working on the next Ghostbusters film with an al-female cast of Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones, and Kate McKinnon. Don’t think I’ve seen Jones or McKinnon in anything, but I thought Bridesmaids was one of the funniest movies to come out in the past few years, so if Feig, McCarthy, and Wiig are involved, I’m definitely onboard.

 

The second is The Crow. This is a franchise that has not had a single iota of luck since the first film. Even with how great that movie was, it cost us the life of Brandon Lee, who probably would have gone on to bigger and better things had he survived. The sequel, The Crow: City of Angels, was butchered by Miramax in the editing room, resulting in a film that was cut to mirror the progression of the original. And the less said about Salvation and Wicked Prayer, the better. So when this upcoming Crow film is going to be a remake, it’s understandable why some people would be irritated. Except here’s the thing—it’s not really a remake. James O’Barr confirmed that this film is going back to his original graphic novel and doing a closer adaptation of that. As great as The Crow was, it was more an adaptation of tone than of content. As O’Barr himself said, “Brandon Lee will always be Eric Draven,” but this isn’t going to be a movie about Eric Draven (the surname was added to the movie, he was just Eric in the graphic novel).

 

And this brings me back to Battlestar Galactica. The conventional wisdom of fans is that “remakes are horrible and should never, ever be attempted.” I think that’s short-sighted as hell. Are there crappy remakes out there? Oh hell yes. But there are also a lot of wonderful remakes in the world. If the fan mentality that “we should never had remakes” was followed, here is a list of movies we never would have gotten:

 

The Fly
The Thing
The Magnificent Seven
A Fistful of Dollars
Scarface
The Departed
Dawn of the Dead
3:10 To Yuma
True Grit
Ocean’s Eleven
Cape Fear
13 Assassins
The Birdcage
Solaris
Black Caesar
Fatal Attraction
The Fog
Godzilla (2014)
The Mummy
True Lies

 

Technically, we could probably add Casino Royale to that list as well. After all, if fans are counting a new adaptation of The Crow as a remake, then technically Casino Royale qualifies as well—there were two adaptations of that book prior to Daniel Craig’s first Bond outing. One was a made-for-TV movie that reimagined MI6’s James Bond as the CIA’s Jimmy Bond, and there was a comedy spoof of it in the 60s featuring David Niven. We could also count Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy as a remake as well. And also Captain America: The First Avenger, given that there was a Captain America movie released in the early 90s.

 

Remakes are just like any other type of movie—there are good ones and there are bad ones. But making a blanket statement that all remakes are terrible is like making a blanket statement that all sci-fi movies are terrible. There are remakes that can be just as good as the original. And sometimes, they can even surpass the original. Again, look at Battlestar Galactica. The original show was awful—a cheesy Star Wars knock-off mixed with Mormon propaganda (and FYI, the story of Star Wars was heavily influenced by Akira Kurosawa’s The Hidden Fortress, so technically there’s another one). But the remake is really smart TV. Well-crafted stories, fully developed characters, and content that really makes you think about the issues being addressed in the show. And if we had listened to the people who damn all remakes on principle, we never would have gotten it.

 

Something to think about. Now I’m off to watch more BSG.

WordPress Plugins and Some New WhatCulture Articles

wordpress_logoOne of the things I like a lot about WordPress are all the plugins it has. It can really help to enhance a site. Besides having my own webspace that I paid for (as opposed to using the limited free services on WordPress.com), I took it a step further and also bought the Magazine Premium theme, which has been wonderful.

One plugin I’ve been struggling to find is something that will easily display all my different books. If you use the navigation bar to find my titles, you’ll see I’ve got them split into different series. For the most part, I do this with the use of categories and make the pages as simple WordPress entries.

It’s far from being the ideal set-up. Quite far, actually. There are a few different plugins that allow me to display my books, information about them, and buy links to them, and I thought I’d talk about some of these today.

First up is Buy This Book. It provides buy links for Amazon, Kobo, Barnes & Noble, Smashwords, Lulu, iBooks, and one custom option. Books are displayed with just the cover and if you click on the cover, a slide-out menu with the buy buttons will appear. It’s got support for the major sites, plus a custom one. The downside, however, is that it’s just a widget for sidebars. Not as helpful if you want to provide more information about your books.

Next is MyBooks for Authors. This takes it a step up from Buy This Book. The sites it supports are Amazon, Barnes & Noble, iBooks, 800 CEO READ (a site for business books), IndieBound, Books-A-Million, and also iTunes and Audible if your book’s available in audio format. The buttons are displayed nicely beneath the cover and everything is aligned well. There’s also a sidebar widget that can be set up to slide through different books. Not bad so far. But there’s no support for some of the other things I’d like, such as being able to connect books in a series.

Third is Totally Booked. This one actually shows the most promise of all four (we’ll get to the fourth one in a moment). They provide links for Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Books-A-Million, IndieBound, and…ChristianBook. Support for a niche market like ChristianBook without support for iTunes and Kobo, two of the big four online booksellers, is definitely a bit strange, but whatever. There’s one buy button and when you click it, a pop-up window appears with all the various sites you can buy the book from. That definitely cuts down on clutter. And there’s support for genres and series with links at the bottom where you find links for other books in the series, other books by the same author, and other books in the same genre. The problem here is that there’s no differentiation. For example, Tales of the Rook isn’t a book I wrote by myself, I just wrote one story. So if I clicked the more by this author, which author would it list? Me? Barry Reese? Bobby Nash? Tommy Hancock? And what about multiple genres? Chasing The Dragon is partly a horror book, but it’s also a crime novel. And a thriller. If I clicked the “find more books in this genre,” which genre would it list? Also, there’s a major problem with theme integration, in that it doesn’t work with my theme. Fortunately, the developers have said they plan to address the theme support in the next release and are also going to look at the other suggestions. If those things are addressed, this may be the one to go with.

And finally is MyBookTable. This is a relatively new one and seemed to show the most promise at first. For one, their layout is the best of all of them. They’ve also got support for series, multiple authors, and multiple genres, all of which are individually-clickable links. So far, so good. But the only link you get with them is Amazon. If you want more, you have to pay for the pro version, which is $49. The pro version is also required if you want to use Amazon’s affiliate system (if you want to sell your books directly with a PayPal button, that requires a developer version ($99). So they want you to pay $49 before you get the links that are provided by other plugins, that’s a definite turn-off. But the final nail in the coffin is theme integration. They only support the free WordPress themes and select other themes (all of which are paid). Support for the plugin also requires a paid version.

At the moment, it looks like Totally Booked is going to come out as the winner. They seem the most dedicated to providing a product that can work for as many authors as possible, regardless of how much money you give them.

Anyway, on the WhatCulture front, I’ve got four new articles for you to check out, if you haven’t yet:

5 Reasons Mark Ruffalo’s Hulk Should Get His Own Movie

10 Irresistible Quentin Tarantino Spin-Offs That Definitely Deserve To Be Made

8 Changes That Would Have Completely Fixed Batman Forever

6 Worst Ever Comic Book TV Shows

UPDATE: Since I posted this piece, MyBookTable came out with an update to their app. it can now integrate with my theme without problems and they’ve also added Barnes & Noble links to the free version. For now it’s the one I’m going with, but Totally Booked could still impress me.

Want to Write Batman? Here’s Your Chance

batmanAmazon is preparing to launch Kindle Worlds. This is a new platform that will allow anyone to submit novels, novellas, and short stories inspired by the properties they’ve licensed.

If you’re thinking, “hey, that kind of sounds like fanfiction, doesn’t it?” then you’d be right. Amazon has now found a way to monetize fanfiction.

Of course, not all properties will be licensed. To date, Amazon’s Kindle Worlds page mentioned that they’ve secured the rights to Warner Bros. Television Group’s Alloy Entertainment shows Gossip Girl, Pretty Little Liars, and The Vampire Diaries. It remains to be seen whether or not you’ll actually get the chance to dust off that Batman story you have posted up at fanfiction.net and be able to publish it.

Now, some people will understandably be skeptical about this. After all, just what exactly are we looking at here? Well, according to the Kindle Worlds’ site, Amazon will set the prices of all works from $0.99-3.99. The standard royalty for these works is 35% for 10,000 words or more and 20% for works between 5,000-10,000 words. Amazon gets the global publication rights to your story, but you retain the copyright to original, copyrightable elements, such as characters and scenes, that you create (but you also grant Amazon a license to them, so other creators can build upon your work).

That’s…actually not a bad deal at all. 35% royalties sounds like a pretty decent cut. While you don’t retain the publication rights to the story, that’s also pretty much standard for work-for-hire contracts. So even if you got accepted to write something for Warner Bros., there’s no guarantee you’d get a better deal.

The platform will launch next month and Amazon is in the process of trying to secure other licenses. If this takes off, it could mean a chance for independent authors to get wider exposure by giving them a chance to work on some big-name properties.

When I started writing, it was fanfiction. I found it to be a great way to hone my skills and develop my writing style. Hopefully, Warner Bros. will allow their DC Comics’ properties to be used. Because I’ve got a Superman story I’ve had sitting around for a long time that I’d love to polish off and send their way.

Making The Punisher Work

punisher-bradstreetI want you to think for a moment about how many successful movies and TV shows have featured a veritable one-man army taking the law into his own hands and dealing out harsh justice to some well-deserving bad guys.

Can you think of one? My guess is you probably have difficulty thinking of just one. That’s because Hollywood has a very, very, very long history of telling these types of stories, and why not? They’re straightforward, they don’t have to be expensive, and people seem to really like them.

So why is it then that we’ve now had not one, not two, but three separate movies featuring Frank Castle, the Punisher, and none of them have managed to really get it right? The Punisher should be the easiest comic book character to make a successful movie out of. Yet no one seems to have really been able to do it. And more than that, what can Marvel do to make the Punisher work now that they have the rights back.

First, let’s look at the film that started it all.

punisher-lundgrenThe Punisher (1989)

This film was the first attempt to bring Frank Castle to the big screen. It featured Dolph Lundgren with his hair dyed black. In this movie, Frank Castle is a former police officer whose family is killed in a mob hit. Legally declared dead, Castle now lives in the sewers and wages a one-man war on crime. His former partner (Louis Gossett Jr.) is trying to bring him in. Meanwhile, the mafia is under threat from the Yakuza, who have kidnapped their children and the only one they can turn to is the man who has declared war on them.

In the plus column, Lundgren does a pretty good job as Castle. But the script isn’t too terribly good and there’s some cheeseball parts in here that are real cringe-worthy. Its biggest failing, though, is that if you stumbled on this movie late at night and missed the opening credits, chances are you could go a good long while before realizing it’s a Punisher movie. It’s such a generic action movie and one of the biggest mistakes is they didn’t include the Punisher’s trademark skull shirt. Just including that little detail would have gone a long way to differentiating this from all the other B-flicks flying around at the time.

Because of the studio’s financial difficulties at the time, this didn’t even get a theatrical release in the States and was instead released straight-to-video. It was so poorly received that no one would try again until fifteen years later. That’s when we got…

tomjane-punisherThe Punisher (2004)

When I first saw the movie Thursday, I came away with one thought: the actor who played Casey, a former drug dealer who has gone straight and whose life is thrown upside-down when his old partner comes calling, would make for the perfect Frank Castle. As long as he dyed his hair black.

That actor? Thomas Jane. So you can imagine my excitement when my dream pick ended up being cast in Jonathan Hensleigh’s Punisher reboot. This time around, they stuck a bit closer to the comics, including giving Frank his signature death’s head symbol.

This time around, Castle was ex-military who was working with the FBI. On his last job, the son of money launderer Howard Saint is killed. Saint (John Travolta) is not happy about this and he and his wife order a hit on Castle’s family while he’s at a reunion in Puerto Rico.

The beginning is slow and the family reunion scene is just pointless. This movie really suffers from OSS—Origin Story Syndrome. Once we get past the origin and Castle becomes the Punisher, then it picks up a notch (despite some cheesy moments from Castle’s neighbors).

Jane is absolutely perfect as Castle, but the biggest problem once more is the script. He dropped out of the sequel because he didn’t like the direction it was taking, and so that led to the sequel becoming a reboot, and that brings us to…

MP_PunisherWarZone_DVDFSWS_OCARD.inddPunisher: War Zone (2008)

This time around, Ray Stevenson plays the part of Frank Castle. And it’s also the closest we’ve gotten to a good script and the one that stays closest to the comics.

The Punisher’s origin is told very simply in a quick flashback. Castle is a military guy and he’s back in New York (the previous film being set in Tampa). They even managed to work in a little-known tidbit from the comics—before the military, Frank was studying to become a priest. We’ve also got a better supporting cast in the form of Microchip, played—surprisingly well—by Wayne Knight. And we’ve also got the Punisher’s nemesis from the comics, Billy Russo, Jigsaw (Dominic West).

Stevenson does a good job, but the costume design was really bad. I get they tried to make him look like he’s wearing body armor, but that vest makes it look like he’s wearing a neck brace. And in a lot of scenes, the skull is so faint that it can barely be seen. Costume design aside, though, he’s good. Not as good as Jane, but he gets the job done.

Dominic West, however, is just terrible. Same goes for Jigsaw’s brother, Looney Bin Jim (Doug Hutchison). Right in the middle of this serious movie, director Lexi Alexander dropped in two characters who act like they should be in an R-rated version of the old Batman TV show—yes, they really are that campy. There’s a total disconnect between Stevenson’s serious performance and West’s cartoonish over-the-top debacle.

The tragedy of the latter two Punisher films is that if you took Jane, Travolta, and Will Patton (who played Howard Saint’s right-hand man in 2004’s Punisher) and cast them as the Punisher, Jigsaw, and Looney Bin Jim, then you’d have a really awesome film that I think both the average movie-goer and Punisher fans alike would have been happy with.

So now the question…

Where Do We Go From Here?

That’s actually pretty simple. If you haven’t yet, go watch Dirty Laundry on YouTube. It’s an unauthorized short Punisher film starring Jane as well as Ron Perlman and directed by Phil Joanou. And it is incredible. This is what a Punisher movie should be like—dark, uncompromising, and violent.

But I say, forget the movie route. Three times we’ve tried, now let’s try something different. Marvel is looking to expand into live-action television, starting with ABC’s upcoming SHIELD series. And one of the easiest characters to bring to television is the Punisher…depending on how you bring it to TV. There was, briefly, a Punisher series in development recently, but it looked like bad news from the start.

Now here’s my idea. If you haven’t yet, check out Netflix’s remake of House of Cards, directed by David Fincher and starring Kevin Spacey. It’s a Netflix exclusive series and it is remarkable. Disney recently signed a licensing deal with Netflix. And while the Punisher isn’t a good fit for network TV with all its constraints, there wouldn’t be any such constraints if the show were a Netflix series.

It’s pretty simple, actually—hire Phil Joanou to develop a Punisher series for Netflix and get Tom Jane to star in the title role (I also wouldn’t mind seeing Wayne Knight back as Microchip). Everything’s already set up for it. Jane is very interested in coming back to the role and is very fond of the character, Joanou obviously has an interest as well, or else he wouldn’t have directed Dirty Laundry. Disney now owns Marvel and Marvel Studios recently got back the rights for the Punisher, and now Disney and Netflix have a licensing deal in place.

It’s a great solution all around. You’ll get a live-action Punisher that will enjoy more success and a broader reach than another movie, and it will also help both Marvel and Disney utilize new media.