Vanguard’s third season comes to a stunning conclusion!

Vanguard 015The third season of Vanguard has had quite a lot of twist and turns so far. Not only this season, but the series as a whole has all been building up to this very episode!

Following the events of the past episode, the team is split apart and hunted! Can they regroup and avoid their pursuers long enough to put a stop to the impending Kotharian invasion?

Questions are answered, but even more are raised and this episode is a massive turning point for the series!

This was a really fun episode for me to write. In fact, I think it may actually be the best episode of the series to date.

It’s 99¢ for right now, but hurry up and buy it, because the price will go up very soon! Also on Kindle Unlimited.

Pick it up and be sure to give it a review.

Nothing Found

Set sail with Sinbad!

Air-128The latest volume of Airship 27’s Sinbad: The New Voyages was just released, and this book has a story by me!

A few years ago, Ron Fortier of Airship 27 read my fantasy novel, SoulQuest, and he felt that I’d be a good fit for this anthology. He gave me the series bible and one of the things that stood out to me was the character of Tishimi, a female Japanese warrior.

So I decided to write a tale centering on her and the Blue Nymph’s attempt to discover the lost treasure of Himiko and the nation-state of Yamatai.

It was a fun tale to write and now it’s available for you to check out! The book also includes stories by Ron Fortier, Barbara Doran, and Lee Houston Jr.

Here’s the description:

The Crew of the Blue Nymph. They are the most daring, courageous, fool-hardy seagoing crew ever assembled. Foremost among them are Henri Delacrois, the French archer, Ralf Gunarson, the blonde Viking giant, Tishimi Osara the lovely female samurai, and Omar the irascible first mate. These are the colorful adventurers of the magnificent Blue Nymph. All pledged to follow their captain, the most famous sailor of all time, Sinbad El Ari.

Now they return in four brand new fantasy tales by Barbara Doran, Ron Fortier, Lee Houston Jr. and Percival Constantine. Set against the backdrop of far-off exotic lands filled with magic and mystery here are epic tales worthy of this legendary hero, Sinbad the Sailor!

It’s out now both on Kindle and in paperback. Check it out by clicking the button below.

Nothing Found

Vanguard #13 is out now!

Vanguard 013Vanguard #13: The Tomorrow Man is now available on Amazon and for free on Kindle Unlimited!

This is an important episode, the one where questions about the Event are answered. And where things move forward in a big way! Chronos arrives in the present after two seasons of build-up, and the results are explosive!

The team learns about their origins and also discovers some very important news about the future.

Check out the description:

A time traveler from the future has arrived with one goal in mind—prevent an impending alien invasion! And his targets…are Vanguard? Who is this mysterious Chronos, how is he connected to the creation of the specials, and why does he believe attacking Vanguard will preserve the future?

This episode marks a huge turning point for the season, changing the game just in time for the two-part season finale coming next month!

It’s 99¢ for a limited time or you can get it with your Kindle Unlimited subscription for free!

Nothing Found

Read this if you want more Myth Hunter

Hammer of the Gods cover_ebookI just wrote “The End” on Hammer of the Gods, the fifth Myth Hunter novella.

It was a lot of fun to write. The words flowed on this book a whole lot more than I expected them to. The Myth Hunter has been a really fun series to write, and I’ve really grown attached to all the characters involved in it.

This book sees Elisa traveling to a South American island called Corbaton. A rumor is that something fell out of the sky, with a witness describing it as a hammer. Freak storms around the island as well lead Elisa to suspect that this object is Mjolnir, the hammer of Thor.

Elisa and her partner, Asami, journey to Corbaton. Also along for the ride is Jason Shroud of the Freemasons. But in pursuit are the Montenegro Sisters, a pair of myth hunters who have some bad blood with Elisa.

I’ve had the idea of this book in my head for a very long time, so it was great to finally get the chance to write it. And the Montenegro Sisters were characters I initially thought up for an aborted Myth Hunter short story, and I’m happy to have the opportunity to finally use them in a story. They’re a lot of fun to write.

Now that Hammer of the Gods is complete, the next project I’m planning to work on is Dante, which will be the fifth and final book in the Infernum series.

As far as The Myth Hunter goes, I think I’ll do at least one book. Honestly, I would like to do a whole lot more. But the series hasn’t proven to be very successful. The most successful book in the series at the time of writing is The Lost Continent, the first book in the series. And the rank of that book on Amazon is below 400,000. Not one of the Myth Hunter books has cracked the top 100 in any category.

That’s pretty disappointing for me. I sell maybe a few copies of the series a month. And as I’m trying to get to a place where I can be a working writer, that means a few copies a month just is not going to cut it.

So if you love Elisa Hill and want to see her adventures continue, then I have a favor to ask of you: show your support. Promote the books on social media. Write reviews on Amazon and Goodreads. Share your favorite quotes on twitter. Recommend the books to your family and friends, or gift them copies.

Whatever you can do to help, please try. Because as much as I love Elisa and her supporting cast, I can’t justify continue writing books that don’t sell. I’m already starting to explore options for more commercial endeavors once I’ve finished Infernum. And if the numbers on The Myth Hunter and Vanguard don’t start to rise, I may also have to replace those series with more commercial ones.

Sadistman v. Mopeman: Yawn of Justice

6bCplVkhowCjTHXWv49UjRPn0eKBatman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice came out in Japan today. Since I had nothing better to do (and since I apparently also make awful life decisions), I went to see it in the theater against my better judgment.

Note to self: Never doubt your instincts again.

To call this movie bad is an insult to bad movies everywhere. It’s awful on just about every conceivable level—probably even hits a few heretofore undiscovered levels of terrible.

In case you haven’t realized yet, this review is going to be filled with spoilers. So if you don’t want to know what happens, best to bookmark this review and come back after you’ve seen the film.

Everything leading up to this movie suggested that it was all going to be about Batman coming out of Metropolis and putting his foot up Superman’s ass to show him that a hero needs to be more careful, especially one as powerful as Superman.

But that’s not really what happens. Because you see, this Batman doesn’t really have a leg to stand on with the whole criticism of killing people. Remember how Christian Bale’s Bruce Wayne refused to kill in Batman Begins? Ducard told him that his compassion is a trait his enemies won’t share and Bruce said that’s why it’s so important.

This Batman? No, he doesn’t give a shit about killing. He regularly steals guns off criminals and pops them himself. He fires round after round from giant-ass Gatling guns on the Batmobile. He even fucking brands criminals by searing his symbol into their goddamn flesh.

No, you’re not imagining things. And don’t bother checking the date, today’s not April 1st. This actually fucking happens in the movie. Snyder’s Batman disfigures criminals for absolutely no stated reason, except seemingly out of some perverse pleasure.

And remember how Snyder said that the whole point of Zod’s death in Man of Steel was so that he could learn his no-killing rule? For a moment, let’s put aside how fucking ridiculous that sounds, because any decent person wouldn’t need to kill someone in order to learn, “oh hey, this is probably a pretty shitty thing to do.” But yeah, Superman still doesn’t give a shit about killing people. When we first see him in this movie, he breaks into a terrorist compound in Africa where Lois is being held prisoner. The terrorist leader has a gun to Lois’ head.

Now remember—Superman has superhuman speed, super breath, and heat vision. And this is a human terrorist with a gun he’s facing off against. Superman can use his breath to blow Lois and the terrorist against the wall, disarming him and giving Supes the chance to get the drop on him. He could use his heat vision to heat up the metal so that it burns the guy’s hand and he has to drop the gun. He could use super-speed to snatch Lois away or grab the gun or grab the guy.

So what does he do instead? Using superhuman speed and strength, he slams the guy through several fucking layers of stone walls! Not only is that a bit excessive, but it’s totally unnecessary.

Lex Luthor basically drives most of the plot. He’s discovered kryptonite and has a big chunk of it he wants to get into the US. He also has access to the body of General Zod and he’s researching metahumans, saying that other people like Superman exist.

Clark Kent is now working at the Daily Planet and he’s really concerned about the Batman in Gotham, seeing as how he’s violating civil rights and brutalizing criminals.

So let’s get this ideological divide straight here. Bruce is pissed because Superman kills without mercy and causes widespread destruction even though Batman does the same fucking thing. And Clark is pissed because Batman violates civil rights and brutalizes thugs even though he fucking slams them through walls.

Why are these two at odds again?

And Lex Luthor is manipulating them both against each other. There’s a Congressional hearing into Superman and Superman goes to testify, Lex meanwhile has given Wally, a Wayne employee who lost his legs in the Metropolis battle, a shiny new wheelchair. At the hearing, the chair explodes and people suspect Superman was involved somehow.

Bruce has been getting the checks he sent Wally returned to him with notes about how he let his family die. And Bruce Wayne, master detective he’s supposed to be, still holds Superman responsible for all this. He steals the kryptonite from Lex and uses it to make some anti-Superman weapons, then goes to Gotham and lights up the bat signal.

Lex kidnaps Lois and throws her off a building, where she’s quickly rescued. Superman confronts Lex and Lex reveals that he’s captured Superman’s mother, Martha. He tells Superman either kill Batman or Martha dies. See, Lex wants to kill Superman because when he as a kid, his dad beat him. So this made Lex realize that gods are either all-powerful and evil or they’re good and powerless. And he wants Superman to fit into this dichotomy. And yes, that is the actual fucking reason Lex is doing all this shit.

Oh, did I mention that Lex was the one sending those notes to Bruce over the past eighteen months since the attack on Metropolis? Meaning he knows who both Batman AND Superman really are. How does he know this? Your guess is as good as mine because it’s never fucking revealed.

Oh and Lex has taken Zod to his old ship and the regeneration chamber. He’s mixed his blood with Zod’s to create something new. How does this work? Who the hell knows. But he does this to take care of Superman after Batman’s dealt with.

Superman goes to Batman and is about to tell him what’s really going on. But Batman just goes, “FUCK THAT LET’S FITE!” and then the “battle of the century” is on. As far as fight scenes go, it’s really fucking dull. It’s too dark to see anything and even though Superman has many chances during the fight to hold Batman still and explain things, he never takes those chances.

Batman eventually gets the upper hand thanks to the kryptonite weapons, including a spear, and he’s about to kill him. Superman says that if he does, they’ll kill Martha. Now Batman’s confused because Martha was his mother’s name and Lois turns up in the nick of time to explain that it’s also the name of Clark’s mother.

This makes him decide to listen. Nothing else but just hearing his mother’s goddamn name makes him decide to listen. And just like that, they’re on the same side again.

Zod regenerates now as Doomsday and goes off on a rampage. Superman goes to deal with him while Batman goes to rescue Martha.

Oh yeah, and Wonder Woman is involved, too. In her guise as Diana Prince, she appears twice looking for something Lex has. Bruce downloads the data from Lex’s computer and finds a picture of Diana in the Wonder Woman armor dated 1918. He also finds surveillance footage of the Flash, Cyborg, and Aquaman. Oh yeah, and the Flash appears to him briefly in a dream that Bruce then promptly forgets about and never mentions again.

Anyway, seeing Doomsday on TV, Wonder Woman goes to join the fight with Batman and Superman. And Wonder Woman’s battle scene against Doomsday is really the best part of the movie. Seriously, just stand outside for the first two hours, go in to see this scene, and then go out right after that.

Because at this point Superman dies. And it is the dumbest fucking death sequence ever. He takes the kryptonite spear and flies it into Doomsday. And since the kryptonite makes him vulnerable, Doomstay stabs Superman in the chest with his bone protrusions. You know, even though there’s a fucking ageless Amazon right there who isn’t vulnerable to kryptonite and could have easily used the spear too! 

We then get a bunch of mopey scenes about Superman being dead and Bruce and Diana meet at Clark’s grave. Bruce says they have to gather the rest of the metahumans because he has a feeling they’ll have to fight. And then we get one final shot of Superman’s grave and see the fresh dirt flying up, signaling that he’ll come back to life.

Which we already fucking know! We know Superman’s going to be in the Justice League movie. So not only is this death poorly executed, it serves absolutely zero narrative function. It’s just there for the sake of being there. Wonder Woman’s presence in this movie is just her being there for the sake of being there. Same with the scenes of the other Justice Leaguers.

There are a few bright spots in the movie. Gal Gadot, despite being completely unnecessary to the plot, does a great job as Wonder Woman. Ben Affleck, when he isn’t murdering or disfiguring criminals, actually does a pretty good Batman. And Jeremy Irons walks away with the acting credits as Alfred.

But Henry Cavill still has the charisma of wet cardboard. He’s utterly charmless in these movies. There’s no attempt to differentiate his portrayal of Superman from his portrayal of Clark. He never fucking smiles. There’s no sense of the warmth or caring that Superman should exhibit.

And his chemistry with Amy Adams might as well not even exist. Every scene these two share together, it makes you wonder just what the hell they see in each other. You get no sense of any real connection between them. They’re only together because the script says they have to be together.

It’s the same with the Batman/Superman ideological divide. We’re told it’s there, but we’re never shown what it is. Because these are both grimdark sociopaths who resort to brutal violence to solve their problems.

And Jesse Eisenberg. Holy shit, who the fuck thought this would be a good idea for Lex Luthor? It can be a little hard to watch Gene Hackman and Kevin Spacey’s over-the-top portrayals of Lex in Superman: The Movie and Superman Returns. But Eisenberg out-camps both of them combined. It’s like he prepared for this role by watching Jim Carrey’s performance as the Riddler in Batman Forever. Just so terrible.

Seriously, what the fuck happened to Zack Snyder to make him think that every hero should be a sadistic, nihilistic, cynical sociopath? This goes beyond Frank Miller’s take on Batman and Superman. As dark as The Dark Knight Returns was, there was still hope in it. Superman still cared for Batman and saw him as an equal and wanted to do the right thing. Batman still fought for justice and had a code against killing.

But this? This is just disgusting. Back in 1992, there was massive backlash from parents to Batman Returns because it was considered to be far too violent and inappropriate for children. I really, really, really hope we see a similar backlash to Batman v. Superman. Because this is not what Superman or Batman should be.

As a comparison, I want to draw your attention to this: An Open Letter To Supergirl Stars Melissa Benoist and Chyler Leigh, From an Adoptive Mom. Carrie Goldman, the woman who wrote this, talks about how her adoptive daughter is so inspired by Benoist’s portrayal of Supergirl to be a decent person and do the right thing. Read that letter. Not only is it supremely touching, but it also illustrates the huge philosophical problem with DC’s movie division.

Can you imagine someone writing a letter like that to Zack Snyder, Henry Cavill, or Ben Affleck? I sure as hell can’t. Not unless they’re writing in to talk about how they were inspired by Superman to slam someone’s head through a wall. Or how Batman inspired them to burn their name into someone’s flesh.

Think about this: Superman was created in 1938 by two poor Jewish creators. This was during the Great Depression and the rise of fascism and anti-Semitism. Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster created Superman as an escape. They created him so they’d have a hero they could look up to, a symbol that could give them hope. The character has been so inspirational in fact that in the 1940s, The Adventures of Superman radio serial took down the Ku Klux Klan. Remember, this was in 1946, so we’re talking pre-Civil Rights Movement when racism was considered normal. And the power and inspiration of Superman managed to marginalize the KKK to the point where their rapid expansion stopped dead in its tracks and long-time members resigned.

 

Superman is supposed to be a symbol of hope. Whenever I watch Superman: The Movie, I always have a smile on my face during the closing credits. But after watching Man of Steel and now Batman v. Superman, all I feel is exhausted and that I need a drink.

Right now, I’m going to go watch The Batman/Superman Movie: World’s Finest. Because that’s actually a movie that explored the differences between the two characters, made sense, and didn’t make me want to drink myself into a coma afterwards.

Vanguard Season 3 begins here!

Vanguard 011This is it! The third season of Vanguard kicks off in Vanguard #11: Vengeance!

This season will see some really big changes for our heroes as events that have been building ever since the first season start to converge!

The Exemplar went missing after Cerberus’ siege on the island he’d built for specials. But now he’s back, and out for blood! What the Exemplar doesn’t know is that Cerberus has gone through some changes since he last encountered them, and are now even working with Vanguard! Can Vanguard subdue the powerful special before he causes irreparable damage?

Be sure to get it now on Amazon or for free on Kindle Unlimited! But hurry up, because the special 99¢ release price is a limited time offer!

Once you’ve read the book, please post up a review on Amazon!

Nothing Found

How many books equals success?

7295258864_2c8530bdbb_oLast night, I was shown this blog post by Claude Forthomme. The link was shared with me by a fellow indie who was surprised by Forthomme’s headline, “Only 40 Self Published Authors are a Success, says Amazon.”

Only forty? That seems pretty low. Especially because the definition of success is extremely subjective.

One author may define success as winning awards. Another might define it by the size of their mailing list. Still another may say they aren’t successful unless they become a New York Times and/or USA Today best-selling author. For another, it might just be consistently hitting the top ten best-sellers in their genre on Amazon. Or earning a full-time income. Maybe attracting a movie deal.

Some feel successful just having published a book.

So let’s continue on with this post and look at the criteria for success:

40 self-published authors “make money”, all the others, and they number in the hundreds of thousands, don’t. This interesting statistic, recently revealed in a New York Times article, applies to the Kindle Store, but since Amazon is in fact the largest digital publishing platform in the world, it is a safe bet that self-published authors are not doing any better elsewhere.

“Making money” here means selling more than one million e-book copies in the last five years.

Okay, so “making money” is only defined as selling more than one million ebooks over the course of five years. That seemed awfully high to me, so I pulled out my calculator because I’m a writer and bad at math:

1,000,000 ÷ 5 = 200,000

So we need to sell 200,000 copies a year to be successful. Now break down the royalties for that. Every ebook retailer pays self-published authors 70% of every sale. The average price of an indie book falls between $2.99-$4.99. There are some exceptions, but that’s where you’ll find the majority. Let’s go with $2.99 for the purposes of this demonstration. For each $2.99 book sold, the author gets around $2. Fluctuates a bit when Amazon plays shenanigans with the price (sometimes it will show as being $2.90 or something), but $2 is a good number to work with.

200,000 * 2 = 400,000

Wait, so to be successful, we have to be making $400,000 a year in sales?!

Now don’t get me wrong, I would absolutely love to be making $400,000 a year. With that kind of money, I would do…well, I don’t even know what I would do, because I’ve never had that much money.

But if that’s the criteria we’re using to define success, then of course there are only a small percentage of writers who are pulling that down. Expand that beyond the writing profession—there are only a small percentage of people pulling that down!

So how do we define “making money” or “success”? For the purposes of this post, I’m going to define success as making a full-time income off book sales. The median income in the United States is around $50,000 a year. You don’t need to be making that much money in order to survive—if you’re living in Oklahoma, you can get by on a lot less per year than if you’re living in San Francisco. But $50,000 a year is a good number to use for our purposes.

50,000 (our annual income goal) ÷ 2 (royalty per book) = 25,000

We need to sell 25,000 books a year in order to make $50,000. Of course, this doesn’t take expenses into account, such as the cost of advertising and book production plus the additional expenses of maintaining a website and mailing list. But those expenses vary per author and this gives us a base idea to work with.

Selling 25,000 books a year may seem like a lot. Especially if you only publish one book a year. But most indies publish more than that. Say you publish five books every year:

25,000 (target ebook sales) ÷ 5 (number of books per year) = 5,000

Now we only need to sell 5,000 copies of each title every year to make a full-time income. If you have a series that draws your readers in, this becomes even easier. Readers who loved book 1 already know they like your writing and your characters, so it’s far more likely that they’re going to continue on to book 2.

You aren’t just going to leave your entire income dependent on those five books, though. Each year you’re publishing, you’re also building up your backlist, which gives you a way to generate even more passive income. Writing’s different from other jobs in that not only can you work without pants, but you can still make money off the work you’ve completed in years past.

In year one you’ll publish five, then in year two you’ll publish another five. So now you have ten books generating income. This lessens the amount of copies each book needs to sell in order to get us that $50,000 a year income.

25,000 (target ebook sales) ÷ 10 (books from years 1-2) = 2,500

In year two, we only have to sell 2,500 copies per title to make $50,000.

So let’s jump ahead to year five since the Forthomme used five years as the barometer. If you write five books a year, then by the fifth year you’ll have twenty-five titles generating money.

25,000 (target ebook sales) ÷ 25 (total books in your catalogue from years 1-5) = 1,000

We only have to sell a thousand copies per title per year in order to make a full-time income.

And if you’re selling at the $3.99 or $4.99 price points, you make more money per sale, so you need to sell fewer copies per title. This income also doesn’t take into account other formats, like audio or print.

Of course there’s no guarantee this is how it will work out. The first book in a series is usually the one that sells the most and there’s drop-off as the series continues. Few people will start a series with the fifth book. I don’t know any author who sells the same number of copies across all their titles.

But the point of this is that the definition of success as selling millions of books isn’t really an accurate number for indie authors. You don’t need to sell millions of books to be a success. You don’t even need to sell hundreds of thousands of books. You only need to sell tens of thousands of books in a year to be successful.

“Oh, only tens of thousands?”

Okay yeah, it’s still a lot and a difficult bar to reach for many. There’s a lot of work you have to do in order to move those tens of thousands of books per year. I know I’m definitely not there yet. I hope to be one day. But I just wanted to point out that it’s not as insurmountable a gap as it seems.

EDITED TO ADD: The New York Times article that prompted Forthomme’s comment about only forty authors being successful actually said something quite different:

Over the last five years, close to 40 independent authors have sold more than a million copies of their e-books on Amazon, the company said.

The wording is pretty different from Forthomme’s comment. Neither Amazon nor even NYT said that only forty indie authors are successful, but that forty have sold more than a million copies.

Knowing when to rewrite

vanguard-s03-promoLast week, I came very close to finishing Vanguard #14. In fact, I was less than a thousand words from the finish line. I’m already behind schedule on completion of season three, thanks in part to some unexpected computer repairs.

But still, I realized what the problem was. It wasn’t the stress of trying to meet the deadlines that was causing me to struggle. Instead, the problem was that the story just wasn’t right. At least not in the way I was telling it.

Originally, when I was mapping out the third season, episodes #11-13 and #15 came very easily. But #14 felt like empty space. I needed another episode to get to the usual standard of five episodes per season, I just couldn’t find out what the problem was.

And then I realized—the problem was I kept thinking that the finale would be a typical finale, so it would be able to fit into a single episode.

Now I know how wrong I was. The season three finale will be a massive turning point for the series. And once I saw that, I realized that it’s actually supposed to be a two-part episode.

So over the weekend, I went over what I had already written. I found out that about a quarter of what I’d written could be salvaged and used in the new episode. And then I remapped the episode and started writing it all over today.

And to my surprise, it works so much better. The previous draft felt more like filler than an actual episode. This now feels like it fits in so much better. Sometimes you have to take stock of what you’re doing and even if it means more work or missing deadlines, do what’s best for the story.

I have a lot more time on my hands this month, so the hope is I can double my daily word count goals. If all goes well, I’ll still be able to get Vanguard Season Three on schedule for release beginning in the middle of March.

And in case you’re wondering about The Complete Second Season? Check back next week.

Spectre Review

n7ypO2ATJJOKZhQTOmc8t7FNoZxDaniel Craig’s stint as James Bond has been overall pretty good. Even though I didn’t think a reboot was needed, Casino Royale was a fresh take on the mythos and really did a great job bringing Bond into the twenty-first century (much like GoldenEye did for a post-Cold War Bond).

Quantum of Solace was a hot mess and the less said about that the better. But Skyfall felt like a return to greatness in more ways than one. The third act was a little bit of a mess and I didn’t think we needed a Home Alone-esque showdown. But Silva was in the mold of a classic Bond villain, we got to see some of the old staples of the series return, and it set the stage for a neo-classic Bond film. So I was really excited when it was announced that Craig’s fourth outing would be titled Spectre.

For those of you who aren’t Bond aficionados, SPECTRE was the name of an international organization run by Ernst Stavro Blofeld in both the Bond novels and the Connery/Lazenby films. He appeared in shadow beginning with From Russia With Love but was shown in full in You Only Live Twice (played by Donald Pleasance). But due to legal issues, EON Productions wasn’t allowed to use SPECTRE or Blofeld for decades. Now that’s all been resolved and SPECTRE was brought back.

So how was the film? Well…it’s no Casino Royale and it’s not quite the neo-classic I’d been hoping for. But it’s still pretty good.

Before I get too deep into this, please note that spoilers are going to follow. If you haven’t seen Spectre and care about spoilers, then you should probably turn back now.

The movie hits a lot of familiar notes. This is a movie for people who are very familiar with the entire film series. There are tons of callbacks to earlier movies, from locations to clothing to characters. And as someone who really missed those elements in the Craig series to date, it was wonderful seeing them again.

The basic story is more or less pretty good. Spectre is basically trying to convince the world that they need more surveillance and that they need to share that intelligence with others, so Spectre will have access to all the world’s intelligence data. It’s a story that has real relevance in the modern day and also has some commonalities with Captain America: The Winter Soldier.

But where things start to get shaky is with Franz Oberhauser’s relationship with Bond. Here’s the biggest mistake made with this film: the movie’s called Spectre, the head of Spectre is played by Christoph Waltz, but everyone involved tried to claim that he wasn’t actually Ernst Stavro Blofeld. That was total bullshit. Of course Waltz was playing Blofeld. Everyone knew that from the start. It was the same kind of lying that JJ Abrams tried to pull with Star Trek Into Darkness, when he swore up and down that Benedict Cumberbatch wasn’t playing Khan.

There was simply no need for this deception. It was a waste of energy. And the big reveal had me sitting in my chair going, “Yeah? What else is new?”

The second big misstep is the Bond/Blofeld relationship. One of the revelations in the movie is that Blofeld and Spectre have been working behind the scenes of all of Bond’s enemies—Le Chiffre, Dominic Greene, and Raoul Silva. It makes sense with Le Chiffre and Greene at least, Quantum was essentially a poor man’s Spectre anyway. Silva’s a bit more of a stretch. But Blofeld’s reason for this? Because when Bond’s parents died, Blofeld’s father adopted him and Blofeld resented the attention his father gave Bond.

Not only is this completely unnecessary, but it also strains believability. Blofeld kills his father, changes his name, builds up a terrorist organization, and coincidentally his adopted brother who he hates also becomes a 00-agent and their paths are going to cross.

Blofeld doesn’t need to have a past with Bond in order to be a threat. Mads Mikkelsen’s Le Chiffre was the most brilliant of all the enemies Bond faced off against, the most ruthless as well, and yet they had no personal connection whatsoever. But Le Chiffre was a far more effective villain than Greene, who was partly responsible for Vesper’s death, or Silva who also had this weird twisted familial view of Bond and M.

All that being said, the movie is very entertaining and it’s definitely a step in the right direction for the series. The future is up in the air. Waltz has said he’d come back for the next two films in the series, but only if Daniel Craig does as well. Craig isn’t contracted for any further films and he’s been pretty vocal about how difficult a film like this is to make, so it’s unknown if he’ll come back for any future films.

You can pick up Spectre online at Amazon or iTunes.

If you enjoy spy fiction, consider checking out my Infernum series of books.

The Lost Continent now available in audio!

Lost-Continent-cover_audiobook-smCurious what the voices of your favorite characters in The Myth Hunter series sound like? Well, the wait’s over!

The Lost Continent, the book that introduced the world to myth hunter Elisa Hill, her colorful allies and her dangerous foes, is now available as an audiobook!

Narrator Caroline McLaughlin, who has narrated a number of titles Earth’s Requiem and Vampire Vendetta, has done an incredible job of bringing the characters to life! Her take even gave me some new insight to the characters I hadn’t considered before.

Rediscover Elisa’s search for the lost continent of Lemuria today!

The Lost Continent is now available in audio format at Audible! Pick it up today for $14.95 or you can get it free with a 30-day trial!